Talk:Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte - Revision history

Gryzze at 01:31, 27 July 2007

2007-07-27T01:31:39Z

2007-07-27T01:26:30Z

2007-07-27T01:16:20Z

2007-07-27T00:24:50Z

2007-07-27T00:24:23Z

2007-07-27T00:15:03Z

2007-07-27T00:14:22Z

New page

Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana o Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 27 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
	:Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		:Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
		+
		+
		+	I'm going ahead with the move... --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:31, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:26, 27 July 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
	::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:16, 27 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
	:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
		+	::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 27 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
−	:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)	+	:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 27 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)		Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
		+	:Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "[[Kimi no Nawa]]" to "Kimi no Na wa". [[User:Groink\|Groink]] 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 27 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana o Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)	+	Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi '''niwa''' Hana '''wo''' Katte"? --[[User:Gryzze\|Gryzze]] 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)