Difference between revisions of "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte"
From DramaWiki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT) | ::So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --[[User:Gryzze|Gryzze]] 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT) | :Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I'm going ahead with the move... --[[User:Gryzze|Gryzze]] 20:31, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 18:31, 26 July 2007
Any objections against moving this article to "Kinyobi niwa Hana wo Katte"? --Gryzze 19:14, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
- Objection? Heck no! That romaji is not compliant with how we do the romaji here. Matter of fact, it may actually be "Kinyobi ni wa Hana wo Katte". I'm thinking of fixing "Kimi no Nawa" to "Kimi no Na wa". Groink 19:24, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
- So the preferred practice on DramaWiki is to write compound particles as separate words ("ni wa" as opposed to "niwa")? --Gryzze 20:16, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
- Yes. Also, I checked via Google and several commerce sites are splitting apart the particles in their romaji. Groink 20:26, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)
I'm going ahead with the move... --Gryzze 20:31, 26 Jul 2007 (CDT)