Difference between revisions of "Smiling Pasta"
From DramaWiki
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Perhaps we can go back to this synopsis version here [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&oldid=36432]?--[[User:A10203040|A10203040]] 14:54, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT) | :Perhaps we can go back to this synopsis version here [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&oldid=36432]?--[[User:A10203040|A10203040]] 14:54, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT) | ||
::Yes, please revert. Thanks! [[User:Groink|Groink]] 15:19, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT) | ::Yes, please revert. Thanks! [[User:Groink|Groink]] 15:19, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | One more time, please provide a PROPER synopsis of the drama. I removed the current synopsis because it is basically a summary of the characters, NOT the storyline. I WANT A SYNOPSIS ON THE STORYLINE!!!!!! Think about it like this... You're doing this for a school assignment, and a grade is riding on it. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 18:57, 22 Oct 2006 (CDT) | ||
== Messy reviews == | == Messy reviews == | ||
Erm, the review section is in a mess right now. So I'm thinking of removing the 2nd and 3rd "reviews" and reverting the [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&diff=40420&oldid=39996 first review] to the [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&diff=38046&oldid=38038 original form here]. Is this ok with everyone? --[[User:A10203040|A10203040]] 03:43, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT) | Erm, the review section is in a mess right now. So I'm thinking of removing the 2nd and 3rd "reviews" and reverting the [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&diff=40420&oldid=39996 first review] to the [http://wiki.d-addicts.com/index.php?title=Smiling_Pasta&diff=38046&oldid=38038 original form here]. Is this ok with everyone? --[[User:A10203040|A10203040]] 03:43, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Yes, if a review isn't written well, I would remove it. I'm one of those who would never edit someone else's original writing, such as a review. A review isn't something that someone else can improve because a review is basically from a first-person POV. With that, if the reviewer/writer isn't going to take pride in his writing, then don't make DramaWiki suffer along with it. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 04:27, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT) | :Yes, if a review isn't written well, I would remove it. I'm one of those who would never edit someone else's original writing, such as a review. A review isn't something that someone else can improve because a review is basically from a first-person POV. With that, if the reviewer/writer isn't going to take pride in his writing, then don't make DramaWiki suffer along with it. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 04:27, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 22 October 2006
Request re-write of synopsis
A synopsis should NOT contain spoilers. Period. That goes beyond the definition of the term synopsis. If an editor chooses to post spoilers, it should be made on a totally separate article (ex: Smiling Pasta/Spoilers), and a link be placed in the main article within the synopsis section. The philosophy behind this is simple: When a person brings up a web page - ANY web page, an editor should not expect the reader to read ALL signs prior to reading the body of any given article. There's a greater chance that the reader will read the spoiler before discovering the warning message. This is Web Page Design 101 material. Groink 14:30, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT)
- Perhaps we can go back to this synopsis version here [1]?--A10203040 14:54, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT)
- Yes, please revert. Thanks! Groink 15:19, 16 Aug 2006 (EDT)
One more time, please provide a PROPER synopsis of the drama. I removed the current synopsis because it is basically a summary of the characters, NOT the storyline. I WANT A SYNOPSIS ON THE STORYLINE!!!!!! Think about it like this... You're doing this for a school assignment, and a grade is riding on it. Groink 18:57, 22 Oct 2006 (CDT)
Messy reviews
Erm, the review section is in a mess right now. So I'm thinking of removing the 2nd and 3rd "reviews" and reverting the first review to the original form here. Is this ok with everyone? --A10203040 03:43, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT)
- Yes, if a review isn't written well, I would remove it. I'm one of those who would never edit someone else's original writing, such as a review. A review isn't something that someone else can improve because a review is basically from a first-person POV. With that, if the reviewer/writer isn't going to take pride in his writing, then don't make DramaWiki suffer along with it. Groink 04:27, 9 Sep 2006 (EDT)