Difference between revisions of "Litlon"
From DramaWiki
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Ummmmm, that's because most people come to Dramawiki for information in English about Japanese Dramas? If Dramawiki has it wrong, then a lot of other sources will get it wring too. Just a hunch. By the way, most of the results are blogs by fangirls and whatnot, who, once again, get their info from Dramawiki. If you trust those over the official sources, I guess I can't do much. The title is プロポーズ and not プロポーザル, like I already said. | Ummmmm, that's because most people come to Dramawiki for information in English about Japanese Dramas? If Dramawiki has it wrong, then a lot of other sources will get it wring too. Just a hunch. By the way, most of the results are blogs by fangirls and whatnot, who, once again, get their info from Dramawiki. If you trust those over the official sources, I guess I can't do much. The title is プロポーズ and not プロポーザル, like I already said. | ||
:Dude, first off don't give me shit like "Ummmmm" and such. You're just a punk. You made your point. [http://blogs.indiewire.com/twhalliii/middle_finger.jpg You deal with it among yourself]. Second, you give DramaWiki too much credit. The day the article was created, we used Google like I did just now. And at that time, "Proposal Daisakusen" was still the majority search result over "propose". This is in accordance with our romanization policy, which states that the number-one criterion is the most popular search result on the Internet - regardless of the actual romanization's correctness. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 02:57, 16 Apr 2007 (CDT) | :Dude, first off don't give me shit like "Ummmmm" and such. You're just a punk. You made your point. [http://blogs.indiewire.com/twhalliii/middle_finger.jpg You deal with it among yourself]. Second, you give DramaWiki too much credit. The day the article was created, we used Google like I did just now. And at that time, "Proposal Daisakusen" was still the majority search result over "propose". This is in accordance with our romanization policy, which states that the number-one criterion is the most popular search result on the Internet - regardless of the actual romanization's correctness. [[User:Groink|Groink]] 02:57, 16 Apr 2007 (CDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | So does that mean the article title will remain as it is? Perpetuating the flow of incorrect information, etc, etc? | ||
| + | |||
| + | And you know, I would never have taken that tone with you if your first message hadn't been so condescending and then your second one so sarcastic. It raises a girl's hackles, to say the least. So do unnecessary namecalling and rude gestures. If you don't want to me to take that tone with you, then it would be nice if you reciprocated in kind. The only reason I edited the article was because I had been noticing the wrong title for days and hoping that someone would change it. No one did, so I decided to. I wasn't expecting to fight over it. | ||
Revision as of 01:15, 16 April 2007
Your Article Move
Your article move of Proposal Daisakusen was undone. That was totally inappropriate to do. This article name is in fact correct, according to the katakana プロポーズ, which romanized is "puropoozu". Groink 02:09, 16 Apr 2007 (CDT)
Um, yes, I know how to read katakana. I'm fluent in Japanese, which is why I changed it to "Propose" since that is what the katakana reading of プロポーズ is. The katakana IS NOT プロポーザル. I have also watched a lot of the promotion for this drama and every single time this drama has been called "Propose Daisakusen" and not "Proposal Daisakusen". So I don't understand why the drama title is written incorrectly on Dramawiki.
- Ummmm... Because almost 10,000 articles on Google says otherwise? Just a hunch... Groink 02:36, 16 Apr 2007 (CDT)
Ummmmm, that's because most people come to Dramawiki for information in English about Japanese Dramas? If Dramawiki has it wrong, then a lot of other sources will get it wring too. Just a hunch. By the way, most of the results are blogs by fangirls and whatnot, who, once again, get their info from Dramawiki. If you trust those over the official sources, I guess I can't do much. The title is プロポーズ and not プロポーザル, like I already said.
- Dude, first off don't give me shit like "Ummmmm" and such. You're just a punk. You made your point. You deal with it among yourself. Second, you give DramaWiki too much credit. The day the article was created, we used Google like I did just now. And at that time, "Proposal Daisakusen" was still the majority search result over "propose". This is in accordance with our romanization policy, which states that the number-one criterion is the most popular search result on the Internet - regardless of the actual romanization's correctness. Groink 02:57, 16 Apr 2007 (CDT)
So does that mean the article title will remain as it is? Perpetuating the flow of incorrect information, etc, etc?
And you know, I would never have taken that tone with you if your first message hadn't been so condescending and then your second one so sarcastic. It raises a girl's hackles, to say the least. So do unnecessary namecalling and rude gestures. If you don't want to me to take that tone with you, then it would be nice if you reciprocated in kind. The only reason I edited the article was because I had been noticing the wrong title for days and hoping that someone would change it. No one did, so I decided to. I wasn't expecting to fight over it.