User talk:Dana

Imagery

I see that your reverted both mine and Azndgn26's image for Nam Sang Mi citing "cleaner photo previous photo blends in with bg too much." That was hardly the case. The original image has white background and viewable full face. The new photo you uploaded, however, did not conform with Dramawiki's guideline on image selection. Therefore, I'm reverting your change, again.

I aslo want to point out the new Lee Jun Ki photo quality is not quite acceptable. First, it has too much contrast on the face. (He doesn't look like him anymore. Unless, he had plastic surgery since the last time I watched Hero.) Second, the image is off-center. Please crop image to focus on the face. --WaterOB 20:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I would suggest looking at these images then discussing this http://wiki.d-addicts.com/Moon_Chae_Won, Chen Hao and Lee Da Hae. As far as I am concern these photos don't follow your rules as well. The quality on the new Nam Sang Mi photo uploaded is better in both quality, colour and focus point. dfr529 22:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

LOL! No it's him in the photo. It was taken at the 2010 Shanghai Expo. dfr529 22:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

You are correct in that Moon Chae Won picture doesn't fit with our guideline. And, I hope an editor will replace it with a better picture of her. As for Chen Hao, her image is fine. It is focused on her face (the whole face) and the color is acceptable (it could be better).

Don't get me wrong. The new picture for Nam Sang Mi is gorgeous. BUT, it doesn't fit Dramawiki guideline. We prefer to see her whole face and not just the side of her face. We want it to focus just on the head and not head + upper body. We avoid image with too much artistic touch (high contrast or low saturation). I won't blame you for uploading less than perfect picture if there is none to begin with. The problem you are creating for us is that you replaced a perfectly good picture of Nam Sang Mi with a less than perfect one. So stop changing pictures until you read and understand dramawiki guideline. What you need to do now is change her picture back to the original one. --WaterOB 00:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Alright I have placed the old one back because you were so nice to me. dfr529 00:50, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Lee Jun Ki

I noticed that you kept reverting my changes on his page, changes were made to follow the format and guidelines on the Korean Artist Article Formatting page, especially his profile:

Profile section

[[Image:<image name>|<thumb><frame>|<width>px|right|name of artist]]

== Profile ==
*'''Name:''' <stage name in hangul> / <see note> (<revised romanization>)
*'''Also known as:''' <see note>
*'''Real name:''' <see note>
*'''Nicknames:'''
*'''Profession:'''
*'''Birthdate:''' <see note>
*'''Birthplace:''' <city, province, country>
*'''Height:''' <in cm>
*'''Weight:''' <in kg>
*'''Star sign:'''
*'''Blood type:'''
*'''Family:''' <relationship [[name]] (hangul)>
*'''Talent agency:'''

Lee Jun Ki left Mentor Entertainment to join JG Company Inc. hence the removal. On his biography, we should keep it short, concise, and about his works; there were unnecessary info such as fan meets. Keep in mind that we mainly focus on his TV dramas. Some of the links were replaced because previous links were broken. You may edit his page if necessary otherwise, please refrain from reverting the changes and please follow the guidelines. -- Azndgn26

Your wrong Lee Jun Ki is still in touch with Mentor and completely erasing Mentor from his history isn't encyclopedic. I never submitted any info about fan meets that was from the previous editor. I do follow guidelines. dfr529

"His contract with Mentor Entertainment ended late January and has now decided to join our company," stated a representative from JG on Friday." Source: 10asia -- Azndgn26

Yes his contract but not his contact. It's like having a resume and deleting your past jobs from it. That's what you are doing Azndgn26. Think about it. Let's say I worked at Winners and am now applying for Yishion does that mean I should completely delete Winners from my work history even though they are both in the same retail industry. And I know this is not a resume but it is still a part of his work history. dfr529 22:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

If his contract ended, he's not part of the agency nor is he listed on the site, and his new agency has confirmed to manage solely his activities then there is no reason why we need to keep his old agency. What we want is the artist's current agency, not a whole list of agencies they've belonged to, if that were the case, then every profile would have a list of every single agencies they've belonged to. We also don't want to come across an artist's page and have to figure out which agency they currently belong to. A lot of profiles are up to date but of course editors aren't always aware of new info. Some things will change in an artist's profile whether it be their profession, their family, or talent agency. Profiles (and external links) are up to date info while everything else is more of a database of previous/current works. Editors have always updated talent agencies.

I would also suggest you read the Korean Artist Article Formatting page as the Biography section does not follow the guidelines. Biography sections are labeled with "About ". The links to Virgin Snow and May 18 are broken, check the links before editing them, that's why I replaced them. I also rearranged the ordering of the external links, prioritizing the most reliable, credible and informative sites. -- Azndgn26

Ah I see I saw that there were other pages with Biography on it so I thought it was minor change. In the External links I actually found that Korean Wikipedia is the most up to date on his background. Nate not so much and the epg link is dead (weird I know). And Mentor still has his page link so I placed it with External Links.And I have returned the links to Hacinema for VS and May 18. Everything is expiring.dfr529 07:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)