Korean Personal Names Romanization Preferences
From DramaWiki
There's still a number of errors here and it's ambiguous how to correct them. If the RR listed is wrong and it says follow RR, then is the intention to follow RR or to use what's written?
| Hangul | RR | McR | Dramawiki | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ㅚ | we | oe | Use oi for final (Choi Ja Hye) | RR should be oe and McR uses we. Unclear what DW should be using. |
| ㅞ | wei | we | Follow RR | RR should be we. Unclear what DW should be using. |
There may be more - will update when I spot them. --Vylmen (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2020 (PDT)
- As far as I can tell, ㅚ is oe in both RR and McR, so it should be listed as: Use oi for final (Choi Ja Hye), otherwise follow RR
- Yes, I agree that ㅞ appears to be we in both RR and McR, so it should be listed as: Follow RR
- Aside from the common surname Choi, neither character is regularly used in Korean names.
- Another more fundamental issue with these guidelines is that over the years many artists have been entered into the database, not following these rules at all. Deference has been given to spellings commonly used on other sites or spellings preferred by the artists themselves (or their agencies).
- Examples
- Most instances of 강 are entered as Kang, rather than Gang.
- Most instances of 교 are Kyu, rather than Gyoo.
- Most instances of of 려 are Ryu, rather than Ryoo.
- There are far more cases of 서 listed as Seo, rather than Suh.
- Likewise 여 is usually Yeo, not Yuh.
- 고 is sometimes Ko and sometimes Go.
- 구 is sometimes Goo and sometimes Koo.
- It's a mess.
- I'm guessing this is a spelling mistake:
- As far as I can tell, ㅚ is eo in both RR and McR
- I'm guessing this is a spelling mistake:
- Deference has been given to spellings commonly used on other sites or spellings preferred by the artists themselves (or their agencies).
- Right, but in the absence of that information, it is handy to have a well-documented preference.
- I agree it's messy, but it's understandable, given the speed with which enterprises and governments do IT upgrades (*cough*) and hardcopy documents being costly to replace. In the Netherlands we had a change of rules for when to use dashes in words and when to write a silent n in word contractions that use plural forms (pancake = pannekoek, which is pannen (plural, pans) + koek (cake), but the n is silent and not written). The cost of text book replacements alone was tremendous and no one actually cared, but a few language obsessives. --Vylmen (talk) 04:28, 17 July 2020 (PDT)
- Yes, I meant oe.
- I agree, it is good to have guidelines. I just wanted to make you aware that in practice, those guidelines have simply not been followed in many cases.
- Revised Romanization is a very good system and it is considered the "official" one by the South Korean government, but few Koreans actually know or use it.
- As a native English-speaker, I would never be critical of the irregular spelling rules of any other language. English spelling is absolutely the worst mess of inconsistent rules and artifacts of medieval pronunciations that only make sense to etymologists (people who study word origins). --FritzB (talk) 05:36, 17 July 2020 (PDT)
Proposal for changes and consistency updates
Change proposal to Dramawiki:Korean Personal Names Romanization Preferences.
I would like to propose the following changes to this document, based on how it's been followed. The rationale is that if the majority doesn't follow the rule, change the rule.
| Letter | RR | Dramawiki | Reason for change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Artist or agency preference overrides any of these rules, except the use of dashes: DramaWiki always uses a space to separate name parts. So Yoon Chan Young not |
Add as primary exception. We may want to state what counts as a preference: do we simply take the spelling an agency uses or do they have to communicate it. If it is "take agency spelling from their site", then when you know the agency, you don't have to look through the table. | ||
| ᄀ | g/k | Follow RR (Go Ah Ra, Suk Bo Bae), exceptions:
|
Following what has been entered for Kang and Kyu |
| ㅣ | i | Follow RR (for example Min Do Hee), except for:
|
Il is nowhere written as Yil |
| ㅚ | oe | Follow RR, exception:
Note: No known an example where ㅚ is not final. It may not exist in names. |
Current rule is an error as RR uses oe not we. |
| ᅰ | we | Follow RR | Current rule uses wrong RR representation |
| ᅥ | eo | Use our own rules:
|
Current example actually redirects to usage of eo. Provide unambiguous examples. State Suh versus Seo in practice:
It might be a good idea to clean these up and provide consistency:
|
I'd also like to remove the McR column from the table. For me personally it was confusing and every time I looked up a letter, I had to check if I was referring to the correct column. If we're basing the rules on RR, McR isn't relevant so why clutter the document with information that shouldn't be used. --Vylmen (talk) 17:37, 21 July 2020 (PDT)
- Nicely done ;D I think you are free to proceed with the proposal if you want. We got very few committed editors for Korean pages, most editors will just come and go so they wont really bother to look up at the guidelines. As for me, i'm not an expert in Korean Romanization (i learnt the basic hangul alphabets only), as long as no dash and the 1st alphabet of each syllable is in capital, im okay with Suh or Seo. Tbh, i dont really strict with the romanisation as we are not Korean native anyway, as long as they sound and look nice, i will just leave it. You can always move the page accordingly. We have over 3500++ pages of Korean actors/actresses here and it would take a great effort to correct the wrong ones. I for once tried to clean up and update info on pages of Korean actors previously by following the alphabetical order but in the end i just gave up, lol. It will be endless, unless we got advanced system/bot to make it auto-edit/correct but so far, everything here still needs to be done manually. --Natokajun (talk) 09:14, 22 July 2020 (PDT)
New version
Took a side track and a lot of testing, but now I have the new version available here. I've used this to create new pages and looked at User:FritzB's corrections and adjusted accordingly. I've tried to make the wording and format as consistent as possible. If there's any oversight or rule I missed, please let me know here. --Vylmen (talk) 04:54, 17 August 2020 (PDT)
